International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics, ISSN 1927-1255 print, 1927-1263 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Int J Clin Pediatr and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.theijcp.org

Original Article

Volume 13, Number 3, December 2024, pages 86-95


Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in Preterm Newborns: Ventilatory Profile and the Construction of an Extubation Protocol

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Sample selection process. Source: survey data. IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; FPIC: free, prior and informed consent; PTNB: preterm newborn.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Protocol: weaning and extubation flowchart. SBT: spontaneous breathing test; HR: heart rate; SAB: Silverman-Andersen Bulletin; IP: inspiratory pressure; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; RR: respiratory rate; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; MAP: mean airway pressure; ETCPAP: endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Extubation checklist. IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; SAB: Silverman-Andersen Bulletin; NIPS: Neonatal Infant Pain Scale; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure.

Tables

Table 1. Characteristics of Premature Newborns at Centro Materno Infantil de Contagem, Contagem/Minas Gerais (From August 2021 to January 2022)
 
VariableN = 27
Data were presented in absolute frequency and percentage, n represents the sample and % the relative frequency (%) or amedian, minimum and maximum. Apgar: appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration.
Gender (n, %)
  Male12 (44,4%)
  Female15 (55,6%)
Type of delivery (n, %)
  Natural/vaginal11 (40,7%)
  Cesarean section16 (59,3%)
Antenatal corticosteroid (n, %)
  Yes17 (63,0%)
  No10 (37,0%)
Gestational age (n, %)
  Extremely premature (< 28 weeks)7 (25,9%)
  Moderately premature (28 to 31 weeks and 6 days)14 (51,9%)
  Late premature (32 to 36 weeks + 6 days)6 (22,2%)
Weight at birth (n, %)
  Extremely low weight (less than 1,000 g)10 (37,0%)
  Very low weight (1,000 to 1,499 g)10 (37,0%)
  Low weight (1,500 to 2,499 g)5 (18,5%)
  Over 2,500 g2 (7,4%)
Apgar score (median, minimum and maximuma)
  Apgar - 1st min8 (0 - 9)
  Apgar - 5th min9 (0 - 10)

 

Table 2. Ventilatory and Laboratory Parameters Evaluated Before Extubation at the Centro Materno Infantil de Contagem, Contagem/Minas Gerais (From August 2021 to January 2022)
 
VariableN = 43
Data were presented in frequency and percentage (n, %) or amedian, minimum and maximum. TCPL: pressure-limited time-cycled ventilation; PCV: pressure-controlled ventilation; IP: inspiratory pressure; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; RR: respiratory rate; FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; MAP: mean airway pressure.
Type of mechanical ventilation, n (%)
  TCPL42 (97.7%)
  PCV1 (2.3%)
Ventilatory parameters (median, minimum - maximum)a
  IP15 (12 - 17)
  PEEP6 (5 - 7)
  RR30 (24 - 36)
  FiO230 (21 - 50)
MAP evaluation, n (%)
  Yes13 (30.2%)
  No30 (69.8%)
Arterial blood gases, n (%)
  Yes26 (60.5%)
  No17 (39.5%)
Pulmonary X-ray, n (%)
  Yes22 (51.2%)
  No21 (48.8%)
Drug intervention, n (%)
  Yes13 (30.2%)
  No30 (69.8%)

 

Table 3. Evaluation of the Extubation Outcome in Relation to Ventilatory Support, Medication and Clinical Variables of PTNBs from the Centro Materno Infantil de Contagem (From August 2021 to January 2022)
 
Assessment of extubation events (n = 43)
Events with successful extubation (n = 33)Events with failed extubation (n = 10)
Extreme (n = 5)Moderate (n = 21)Late (n = 7)Extremes (n = 5)Moderate (n = 2)Later (n = 3)
Data were presented in frequency and percentage. NIV: noninvasive ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; Apgar: appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration.
Ventilatory support, n (%)
  NIV4 (80.0)16 (72.2)0 (0.0)5 (100.0)2 (100.0)3 (100.0)
  CPAP1 (20.0)5 (23.8)4 (57.1)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Ambient air0 (0.0)0 (0.0)3 (42.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Presence of stridor, n (%)0 (0.0)2 (9.5)1 (14.3)5 (100.0)2 (100.0)2 (66.7)
Post-extubation micronebulization0 (0.0)3 (14.3)1 (14.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (66.7)
Drug intervention2 (40.0)8 (38.1)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)0 (0.0)2 (66.7)
Pre-extubation 5th min Apgar up to 3 points at birth0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (14.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)

 

Table 4. Extubation Failure Rates According to Age and Birth Weight at Centro Materno Infantil de Contagem - Contagem/Minas Gerais (From August 2021 to January 2022 (N = 43))
 
VariableFailure rate (%)
Extubation failure rate (reintubations within 48 h): total number of extubation failures divided by the total number of extubations × 100 (From August to January 2022).
General fee23.3%
Gestational age
  Extremely premature (< 28 weeks)50%
  Moderately premature (28 to 31 weeks and 6 days)8.7%
  Late premature (32 to 36 weeks + 6 days)30%
Birth weight
Extremely low weight (less than 1,000 g)33.3%
Very low weight (1,000 to 1,499 g)21.4%
Low weight (1,500 to 2,499 g)0%
Over 2,500 g0%